Lehigh acceptance rate at an all time low

21

Designed by Anna Simoneau

Lehigh’s acceptance rate has fallen for the third consecutive year.

Interim vice provost Bruce Bunnick said the acceptance rate for the class of 2021 was 24.7, 1.6 percentage points lower than the class of 2020. Bunnick said one factor that influences the acceptance rate is the quality of students that apply to Lehigh. The selectivity increased because of the high number and quality of applicants.

Bunnick said highly-qualified students come from a variety of backgrounds, have a passion for knowledge and display leadership capabilities. Lehigh’s definition of “highly qualified” doesn’t necessarily mean students who have a high GPA or high test scores, but Bunnick said these are considered in the decision-making process.

Jennifer Castro, director of diversity recruitment and Jade Eggleston, the assistant director, said 35 percent to the students accepted for the class of 2021 represent diversity, of which 10 percent are international students and 25 percent are students of color.

“The biggest thing with our programming is all about access,” Eggleston said. “A lot of times, these students don’t have the means to get here and have never heard of Lehigh before.”

Another factor that influences the acceptance rate is the proportion of students who apply for the early decision programs versus regular decision. Bunnick said one of his goals is to attract students with diverse backgrounds who are underrepresented outside of the mid-Atlantic.

Director of international recruitment Morgan Volkart said this is a long-term goal for Lehigh admissions. 

When Volkart looks for prospective international students, she said she wants students who know why they want to be at Lehigh, how they might contribute to the Lehigh community and whether they are willing to take the risk of going to school far away from home. 

There is a focus on personalizing the experience for prospective students through on-road recruiting across the country as well as regional-level programming, Skype interviews with international students, connecting students with alumni and inviting them to Diversity Life weekend. This also applies to first-generation college students and their families who are completely new to the college experience.

Lehigh’s Western Regional Office located in San Mateo, California, was established to attract students from the West Coast and outside the U.S. There continues to be an emphasis on gaining wider geographic representation from students across the U.S.

Some of the strategies Lehigh uses to attract students from foreign areas — who might otherwise not know of Lehigh — are to develop relationships with high school guidance counselors, marketing and connecting prospective students to current students through the LU Diplomats program. Implementing these strategies could make a difference in whether an admitted student decides to attend.

Bunnick said in the fall of 2019, Lehigh’s first-year class will expand by 125 students from 1,235 to 1,360.

The Path to Prominence, a plan to expand and upgrade Lehigh’s campus, will allow the amount of first-year students to increase by 1,000 over a period of seven years. The new College of Health and construction of new dorms will allow for the increase of students.

Bunnick said although more students will be accepted to Lehigh, selectivity will likely remain the same because of an increased amount of students interested in the College of Health programs.

“We’ll have several more thousand applicants in the pool, so we’ll have more students to choose from,” Bunnick said. “We hope that we will be able to diversify our pool so that we can create a campus environment that reflects and mirrors society.”

As for wait-listed students, Bunnick said 66 students were accepted off the waitlist in 2016. The admissions office tracks how many students commit to Lehigh and submit their deposits to determine how many students will be taken off the waitlist. If the numbers are lower than anticipated in the middle to end of April, students will be taken off the waitlist and are given 72 hours to accept.

Comment policy


Comments posted to The Brown and White website are reviewed by a moderator before being approved. Incendiary speech or harassing language, including comments targeted at individuals, may be deemed unacceptable and not published. Spam and other soliciting will also be declined.

The Brown and White also reserves the right to not publish entirely anonymous comments.

21 Comments

  1. The numbers of this sort that Lehigh publishes each year are a dishonest farce.

    Everybody knows that students applying for admission to college routinely apply to several of them because they don’t which ones will actually make them an offer.

    It is common to apply to some that they don’t want, but they do so anyway as a backup in case they are not accepted where they would really like to go. Other considerations such as financial aid offers also affect decisions when there are multiple offers.

    This link produces a PDF summary of the numbers for the Class of 2020.

    http://www.lehigh.edu/~inis/pdf/admissions/LUadmissions_class_summary_2020.pdf

    The basic words on it are dishonest and misleading.

    It uses the words “Acceptances” and “Admits”. The correct word that should be used is “Offers”.

    The only thing that counts is how many students who were given “Offers” actually accepted them and matriculated to became Lehigh’s class of 2020.

    Looking at those numbers we see 1281 matriculated, from offers to 3905.

    That is a “yield” of almost 36%. The means that 64% of those to whom Lehigh made offers decided to “thumb their nose” at Lehigh and did something else.

    To use an amusing analogy, think of the process as being similar to the dating app Tinder.

    Lehigh was “swiped left” 64% of the time!!!!! Should Lehigh consider that to be a “microaggression”???

    There are more dishonest numbers found on the above summary sheet with regards to SAT scores.
    It talks about a range of scores to whom Lehigh made offers.

    Again, what counts are the score ranges of those who actually matriculated.

    These can be found at this link:

    http://www.lehigh.edu/~oir/cds/lucds2016.htm

    Once there, click on tab CDS-C and scroll down to the C9 section.

    Here you will see that those who actually matriculated had lower SAT scores than those to whom offers were made.

    The point being that some of those who “thumbed their noses” at Lehigh were better quality students with regards to their SAT scores
    .
    The reality is that Lehigh is NOT a first tier school with regards to the academic caliber of its student body.

    That isn’t necessarily bad. Certainly schools such as Cal Tech and MIT attract a higher caliber of student with better SAT scores and the ability to learn things at a fast pace.

    The average Lehigh student would probably struggle and in many cases flunk out of such schools.

    The wise thing to do when looking at colleges is to pick one where your SAT scores are similar to students who will be your peers. That way the pace of your classes will be in tune with your abilities.

    Lehigh does a disservice to applicants by posting phony scores that are higher than what is going on with its actual student body.

    I think this is shameful.

    • The acceptance rate for a university is based on how many students apply, how many students the university expects to matriculate, and the percent of accepted students who are expected to choose another offer. In other words, the rate at which accepted students choose a school over other offers is already baked into the acceptance rate.

      Think about it: If two schools have the same capacity and receive the same number of applicants, but one is attended by a lower percent of accepted applicants, then the acceptance rates for that school must necessarily be higher in order to balance the equation.

      There’s nothing dishonest about using admission rate as a primary metric for selectivity, which is exactly why it is a universal standard.

      P.S.
      “Lehigh was ‘swiped left’ 64% of the time!!!!! Should Lehigh consider that to be a ‘microaggression’???”

      Trust me when I say that this line doesn’t come off nearly as clever or edgy as you imagine…

      • And if that math is too complicated for you, don’t worry; I’m sure someone from Lehigh can help understand 🙂

      • Amy Charles '89 on

        Casey, this metric’s been a farce everywhere for years, and it’s nice that students, if not the parents, are finally catching on. We all understand that this is what drives the recruiter desperation at the college fairs and the incredible onslaught of come-ons from colleges: their primary job is boosting stats in service of the supposedly magic metric, selectivity.

        You’re also wrong about why selectivity’s used as a metric. Happily (or not), other people actually spend parts of their lives studying this garbage, so you can read up if you like. I recommend Wendy Espeland’s book, whose title I’ve forgotten. Sociologist at Northwestern.

        I’ve also been on the admissions end of the apps at one of the most selective programs on the planet, usually low single digits. It’s that selective because holy crap, are most of the applicants bad. No chance. But they’ve convinced themselves they’ve got a chance, or they’re saying “what the hell, I’ll roll the dice” because it’s the top target, like it’s the lottery or something. The number of seats is fixed, so sure, it stays looking desperately competitive. In reality, though, the serious-contender pool is pretty small. If you get in, it’s because you’ve competed well against them, not against thousands, and also because you happen to be a good match for what that program can actually do. That’s going to be the case at every highly selective program in the country: the number of serious contenders is small.

        A much better indicator of a school’s selectivity is still average SAT or, in a pinch, ACT scores. I don’t think SAT’s as good a test as ISEE is, but it’s still pretty good and pretty sensitive. And, weirdly, school cultures are incredibly persistent. The stereotypes hold disquietingly true across decades. So if you’re looking for fit, you want kids about as bright and academic as you, interested culturally in similar things, in a climate you can tolerate, and in a school that has strong faculty in whatever you’re after and where the teaching isn’t left to armies of TAs and VAPs. (Lecturers can be excellent, though.) Oh, and that you can afford. Leave off the selectivity metric unless you’ve got an unconquerable urge to dickmeasuring.

        • Embarrassed to Be Associated on

          Selectivity is nice but it doesn’t seem to mean much tangibly unless hiring managers are actually familiar with the school, even if just because they know it as a “brand name.” For marketing purposes, I am certain that having your alma mater making it to March Madness could even help more than going to, for example, some small liberal arts college that is a hidden gem. This doesn’t make it right, per se, but I am getting my MS from a well-regarded state system and I am sure that the fact that several of their schools have good basketball teams will prove to have a strong ROI for me.

  2. Adele McDermott on

    I really don’t see where your outrage comes from. All schools report admit numbers instead of attending numbers, which gives next year’s applicants a basis for their applications. I think Lehigh is very forthright with the numbers they publish, you would never get Harvard’s legacy admit numbers nor their waitlist numbers in a publicly available publication. And, it stands to reason that the higher caliber students would choose the highest caliber school they got into. All students apply (or should apply) to reach schools, schools in their range and safety schools, that mix is different for everyone. I take offense to what you said about students flunking out of “higher caliber schools”, my daughter goes to MIT and my son will be attending Lehigh and I don’t think one is truly smarter than the other.

  3. DE Clayton, I find this quite offensive. You have no right to judge the Lehigh student body and it is obvious that you do not understand the world of college admissions in the slightest. Please do not waste your time bashing a truly amazing place to go to school, one with a top notch student body full of brilliant thinkers, researchers, and innovators. Lehigh’s students are diverse, creative, and unique. The “average” Lehigh student may not have the test scores to get into Stanford, but what do SAT scores say about a person other than their test taking ability? As you probably don’t know, many schools, including some of those “top tier” ones mentioned, are making tests optional for college applicants. Wake Forest, Bates, Bowdoin… some of the very best in the country, are looking at students based on their whole package, not just some numbers that generate from filling in bubbles. So much more goes into this process than you are eluding to and it’s a shame that though you are so naive, you are trying to bring down Lehigh.

  4. Seriously dude, don't be a jerk on

    D E Clayton “The numbers of this sort that Lehigh publishes each year are a dishonest farce.”

    Lehigh is very open, and provides better information transparency than most schools. You assert that Lehigh is dishonest, but fail to point out any dishonesty.

    The words Acceptances and Admits are standard industry terms. The only schools that might have the power to shift the industry to your preferred term would be the 8 Ivies as a group. If they all agreed to change the term, I suspect others would follow. Blaming Lehigh for this is pointless. Go post that on Harvard’s website.

    D E Clayton “There are more dishonest numbers found on the above summary sheet with regards to SAT scores.
    It talks about a range of scores to whom Lehigh made offers.

    Again, what counts are the score ranges of those who actually matriculated.”

    Again, you are misguided. Both data on admitted students and enrolled students are useful. For example, If you are considering applying, and are trying to understand your chances of admission, the admitted student data is more useful. Nothing about this data is dishonest. Do you know what dishonest means?

    D E Clayton “Here you will see that those who actually matriculated had lower SAT scores than those to whom offers were made.”

    That is true for every school in the country. Nothing about it is unique to Lehigh.

    D E Clayton “The reality is that Lehigh is NOT a first tier school with regards to the academic caliber of its student body. That isn’t necessarily bad. Certainly schools such as Cal Tech and MIT attract a higher caliber of student”

    Lehigh has excellent students. True, it isn’t Cal Tech or MIT, but I don’t remember anyone trying to pretend it is, or even to aspire to be. We are happy being Lehigh. You claim it is not a “First Tier” school, but you do not define that term, so it is impossible for anyone to comment on the accuracy of the statement. If the first tier is Cal Tech and MIT, then I for one, would be proud to be in tier two.

    D E Clayton “Lehigh does a disservice to applicants by posting phony scores that are higher than what is going on with its actual student body.”

    Again, how would Lehigh release the enrolled data instead of admitted student data? Enrolled student data does not exist yet. Every college is releasing the same data Lehigh is. There is nothing phony about it.

    I don’t know why you are so angry at Lehigh. If you did not get accepted, I am sorry to hear that, but you have to understand that it is not personal. Every school has to make difficult decisions with limited information. Lehigh is an outstanding institution with an excellent President who is surrounded by an excellent team of administrators, faculty, staff and students.

    The truth is that Lehigh is very honest about student data, and more transparent than most schools. Alumni, students, parents, and employees appreciate that.

  5. I find the responses from the several of you who took issue with my comment to be interesting.

    Clearly some of you missed the points I attempted to make.

    The first point being the semantics of the words Lehigh uses. I simply suggested that word “Offers” be used to minimize ambiguity.

    The more important point I tried to make, and clearly Adele McDermott understood it and agrees with it, is that the wise thing to do when selecting a college is to pick one where your abilities will match those who will be your peers.

    Doing so avoids the problem of “mismatch”. This is a very real problem. Especially with regards to double standards in admissions policies.

    Thomas Sowell, a brilliant academic and Hoover Institution fellow discusses the problem in this link:

    https://www.creators.com/read/thomas-sowell/06/16/the-fraud-goes-on

    I’ve excerpted the following from his essay:

    ============
    The human tragedy, amid all the legal evasions and frauds is that, while many laws and policies sacrifice some people for the sake of other people, affirmative action manages to harm blacks, whites, Asians and others, even if in different ways.

    Students who are kept out of a college because other students are admitted instead, under racial quotas, obviously lose opportunities they would otherwise have had.

    But minority students admitted to institutions whose academic standards they do not meet are all too often needlessly turned into failures, even when they have the prerequisites for success in some other institution whose normal standards they do meet.

    When black students who scored at the 90th percentile in math were admitted to M.I.T., where the other students scored at the 99th percentile, a significant number of black students failed to graduate there, even though they could have graduated with honors at most other academic institutions.

    We do not have so many students with that kind of ability that we can afford to sacrifice them on the altar to political correctness.

    Such negative consequences of mismatching minority students with institutions, for the sake of racial body count, have been documented in a number of studies, most notably “Mismatch,” a book by Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr., whose sub-title is: “How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It’s Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won’t Admit It.”
    ========

    One of the measure of success in academe is the six-year graduation rate. This website provides access to such data with details broken down by both gender and race:

    http://www.collegeresults.org/

    The most recent data available on this website is for 2014. Thus it is for the 2008-2014 timeframe.
    Lehigh has a rather appalling track record with regards to the graduation success rates between whites and various “under represented” minorities.

    For example, the rate was 90% for whites and 72.7% for blacks. A gap of -17.3%.

    I do not know why blacks have failed to graduate from Lehigh with such a large percentage difference.

    Blacks are doing just fine at peer institutions such as Brown and Rice.

    Without seeing Lehigh’s data on such things as the SAT scores (which I know Lehigh will never release) it is difficult to analyze the problem and figure out how to improve things.

    My observation over many years is that the cabal that is running Lehigh is dominated by a bunch of “White Guilt” obsessed virtucrats who preen themselves into thinking they are morally superior visionaries rather than being hypocritical phonies who have in reality hurt the very people they pretend to help.

    • Amy Charles '89 on

      Yeah, I dunno, Clay, the problem might have something to do with the mindblowing racism of so many of Lehigh’s alumni. It’s a crazy, crazy thing, but kids today have this way of walking away from abuse like that.

      A tip for “figuring out how to improve things”: you could learn to think before you speak, so the racism doesn’t leak out all over the keyboard.

    • Embarrassed to Be Associated on

      Black, White, or Purple, people thrive in environments in which they identify, feel supported, and can pursue a higher purpose. Lehigh seems to be great for people who are White, Christian, middle-to-upper middle class (being actually rich there will make you feel just as out of place as being poor) from the tri-state area, somewhat bright but lacking in intellectual curiosity, and part of the Greek system. I’m sure I am a better person for having experienced and witnessed some of the things I did there, but four years of it was a waste of my young life and my dad’s hard-earned money, speaking of people who got to pay for everyone else’s education.

  6. Michael Mimmers on

    Folks, the game at Lehigh, as with many other second tier privates, is quite simply about keeping the desperately inflated bubble that is college tuition inflated to its full capacity. A health college? Where’s the teaching hospital? What kid in their right mind seeking a health/medical career would attend Lehigh over any school affiliated with a teaching hospital in Boston/NY/Philly? Simon’s plan is a joke. He’s already destroyed the culture of the school, and his twisted liberal nonsense does not differentiate Lehigh from any other milllenial snowflake factory producing substandard graduates at a cost of nearly 70k/year. Lehigh does not even draw from the top 50 faculty pool anymore and it shows in classroom. Used to be it was hard to find a bad prof at Lehigh. Now the classrooms are full of them – many with English skills not good enough for students to understand the lectures.

    10% international students right? Ask yourself how many of them are full pay as compared to the other 90%. They are there in the righteous name of diversity according to the school while anyone who attends Lehigh knows they’re really just there to pay the bills. Large number of Chinese students who don’t ever really integrate with the rest of the student body, attending simply because they’re full pay? That makes Lehigh better? No, it keeps the tenured prof game going, keeps the tuition insanely inflated, and continues to destroy the culture of a once great University. Simon and company gotta go. Alumni checkbooks are staying locked away.

    • > “Where’s the teaching hospital?”

      St. Lukes is the teaching hospital. Temple’s medical school already uses St. Lukes in Bethlehem as part of its program. Lehigh school of medicine is specifically based around this partnership with St. Lukes.

      > “He’s already destroyed the culture of the school, and his twisted liberal nonsense does not differentiate Lehigh from any other milllenial snowflake factory”

      I think I may have pulled an ocular muscle from this eye roll…

      > “10% international students right?… They are there in the righteous name of diversity according to the school while anyone who attends Lehigh knows they’re really just there to pay the bills. Large number of Chinese students who don’t ever really integrate with the rest of the student body, attending simply because they’re full pay?”

      Good lord… no, Lehigh students and alums definitely do not monolithically believe that international students are a foreign blight on the campus culture that we tolerate in order to pay the bills. That’s not just xenophobic — that’s insane…

      > “once great University”

      MLGA, amirite? I’m curious what you believe made Lehigh great before that has been lost.

      • Michael Mimmers on

        Roll your eyes all you want. You sound like a kool-aid drinking lib that needs to get out of the Lehigh Valley once in awhile. St. Luke’s is a clinic, not a hospital. You can deny the facts about the large percentage of full pay Chinese nationals wandering the campus of late. Most of them will head back to China with their degrees after paying full freight for four years. Your liberal head must have exploded after the recent Chinese hate crime on campus.

        Lehigh was great when it pulled professors that TEACH from the top tier (they don’t anymore), had a top flight globally recognized engineering program (not even top 30 program anymore), and had a culture where the building a lifelong networks was encouraged instead of sitting around pounding the liberal mantra of race, gender, and social equality.

        Newsflash: The real world where jobs are acquired, taxes are paid, career networks are built, and capitalism and democracy takes place DOES NOT CARE ABOUT THE NONSENSE BEING TAUGHT AT LIBERAL SILOS RUN BY CAREER ACADEMICS.

        • > “You sound like a kool-aid drinking lib that needs to get out of the Lehigh Valley once in awhile.”

          I work on Wall Street…

          > “You can deny the facts about the large percentage of full pay Chinese nationals wandering the campus of late. Most of them will head back to China with their degrees after paying full freight for four years.”

          They’re not wandering around campus… they are attending the university. That said, you seem to have stumbled ass-backwards into a nugget of truth here; there is, in fact, a growing trend of Chinese students returning to China after graduation, as China continues to position itself as a global tech and finance industry leader. I actually just had a co-worker—another Lehigh grad—transfer to our Shanghai office for a promotion.

          https://www.forbes.com/sites/ljkelly/2018/01/25/how-china-is-winning-back-more-graduates-from-foreign-universities-than-ever-before/

          > “…and had a culture where the building a lifelong networks was encouraged instead of sitting around pounding the liberal mantra of race, gender, and social equality.”

          There it is.

          > “The real world where jobs are acquired, taxes are paid, career networks are built, and capitalism and democracy takes place DOES NOT CARE ABOUT THE NONSENSE BEING TAUGHT AT LIBERAL SILOS RUN BY CAREER ACADEMICS.”

          You pretty much just see the world as an animated Ben Garrison cartoon at this point, don’t you? It sounds like you drifted out of touch with the “real world” a while ago. In all sincerity, I hope you find your way back.

          • Michael Mimmers on

            And you pretty much see the world as some liberal utopia – a utopia in which your friend’s transfer to Shanghai makes you jealous because its put he/she a little closer to the heart of your communist dream. At least you work in the right city. You should get your fill of your kool-aid there. I know Casey because I’m there too. If you think the modern day teachings in our universities are going in the right direction then you are truly beyond help. Its the country that seems to have passed you elites by – not the other way around.

            hurts, don’t it. Enjoy 7 more years of conservatism.

            • > “a utopia in which your friend’s transfer to Shanghai makes you jealous because its put he/she a little closer to the heart of your communist dream.”

              This was actually pretty funny. I mean, it doesn’t make much sense given that Shanghai is one of the world’s leading financial hubs and a shining monument to the efficacy of capitalism… but I’ll give you credit for not having much to work with here.

              > “At least you work in the right city. You should get your fill of your kool-aid there.”

              Even more so now that we moved to Brooklyn! I’m surrounded by beanie wearing baristas and vegetarian brunch spots! I’m pretty sure I’m the most conservative person I know here.

              > “Enjoy 7 more years of conservatism.”

              Oh you sweet summer child… you should catch up with the news.

              • Michael Mimmers on

                The fact that you could ignore Shanghai exists as center of commerce with the permission of Communist rule rather than a freely elected government shows just how far gone you are. Did you ever take a civics class? History? Go read the Constitution if you even know what it is. Go read about Locke, Montesquieu, and Hobbes. Then come talk to me about your utopian dream.

                With respect to the news, was that the news about how the vast majority of governorships, state houses, both houses of congress, soon the Supreme Court, and oh yeah, also the Presidency are all controlled by the right?

                While you’re drinking lattes the rest of the country woke up to what a bunch of stupidity all the race and gender politics of the last eight years was. No more time for your claptrap here. You keep watching msnbc and taking election day off. Suits me fine.

    • Embarrassed to Be Associated on

      @Michael Mimmers: I graduated in 2006 and could barely understand some of my professors to the point where it seemed like a waste of time to attend class. I am still beating myself up for not transferring out. Even though I am doing quite fine in life, it would have been beneficial, I am sure, to meet more like-minded people in that era of my life.

    • Embarrassed to Be Associated on

      I’m not sure that Lehigh’s location is so much the issue with the health science programs but rather that the school seems to have been suffering from an identity crisis for years. I’m female and will be the first to admit that I am sure a higher caliber of student was accepted before it went co-ed and subsequently tried to even out the gender ratio–not a unique issue though to Lehigh. It used to be known as a top engineering school before it decided it did not want to be known for engineering. It has a formidable performing arts facility but so few of the students seem to care that Zoellner exists, let alone take advantage of the performances there by visiting artists and their classmates alike. I could see the health program languishing if not managed properly. After all, this is a school where the Health & Wellness Center was a complete joke. You pretty much had to be on the brink of death to see an actual doctor instead of some dim physician assistant or a nurse. Fortunately for me, my dad was a doctor and could call prescriptions in for me if I was sick. I can’t see much good coming out of this.

Leave a Comment

More in News
Three Fulbright winners represent Lehigh in 2017

Two Lehigh professors and one student received Fulbright scholarships for the 2017-18 academic year. Professors Jill Sperandio and Dinissa Duvanova along...

Close