Lehigh's U.N. partnership held a faculty panel to discuss President Donald Trump's recent speech at the United Nations. Students also had a chance to ask the faculty panel questions. (Shana Lichaw/B&W Staff)

Faculty panel reacts to Trump UN speech

3

The Lehigh-United Nations Partnership held its annual faculty panel in reaction to President Donald Trump’s speech at the United Nations on Sep. 22. 

Due to the pandemic, the panel was held virtually with over 70 students and faculty members in attendance. 

The event was sponsored by the Lehigh-U.N. Partnership, Lehigh’s Student Political Action Committee and, for the first time, co-sponsored by the Lehigh University College Democrats and College Republicans. The Lehigh-U.N. Partnership was solidified in 2004, when Lehigh became one of six universities at the time to be recognized as a U.N.-accredited non-governmental organization. 

Four professors from departments across the university sat on this year’s panel: Mary Anne Madeira, in international relations; Vera Fennell, in political science; Hyunok Choi, in the College of Health; and Frank Gunter, in economics. These professors were chosen based on their knowledge of global issues and were not asked about their political affiliations 

Trump’s speech did not last long and primarily placed blame on China for the COVID-19 pandemic and its contribution to the global rise in carbon emissions. 

“His chief target in this speech was China,” Fennell said. 

While Fennell believes China was delayed in warning the global community of the coronavirus, she said Trump’s attack on China was aggressive and unnecessary. Instead, Fennell maintains that China’s delay had nothing to do with trying to harm the rest of the world. 

“It had to do with the internal dynamics of the Chinese Communist Party and their reaction to SARS 17 years ago,” Fennell said.

Gunter had a similar reaction to Trump’s rhetoric against China. 

“The opposite of love is not hate,” he said. “The opposite of love is indifference.”

Gunter pointed to how Trump is failing to be proactive in mending relations with China and pushing forward a global agenda.

Madeira had a different approach to dissecting Trump’s speech. She said every September at the U.N. General Assembly, the current U.S. president, as the host of the gathering, gives the first speech in order to take stock of the world’s most pressing issues and set the agenda for the rest of the conference. 

Madeira believes this year’s speech was a “missed opportunity” for Trump to show a sense of global leadership. 

“He neglects to lay out any kind of an agenda for specific initiatives that he would like to spearhead in these areas,” Madeira said. “This administration’s ignorance of why we would want to cooperate with the rest of the world on issues we care about is one of the most concerning elements of this presidency … This was a time to set America as a leader, and that was absent.”

The panel continued cycling through each professor’s reaction before shifting to the audience for a Q&A session.. 

Kevin Simons, ‘24, attended the event and asked about the president’s rhetoric. Simons noticed that Trump failed to acknowledge attacks on democracy nationwide, and he wanted to know if Trump was implying that countries don’t need to hold each other accountable. 

The panel’s general reaction was that Trump is an escalator rather than a de-escalator. 

“If Trump is re-elected, we’re in for a lot of global changes,” Madeira said.

Comment policy


Comments posted to The Brown and White website are reviewed by a moderator before being approved. Incendiary speech or harassing language, including comments targeted at individuals, may be deemed unacceptable and not published. Spam and other soliciting will also be declined.

The Brown and White also reserves the right to not publish entirely anonymous comments.

3 Comments

  1. Bruce Haines ‘67 on

    Trump rhetoric with China is appropriate & history will show that Prof Fennell reaction was naive at best. This pandemic was a manufactured pandemic by the Communist Chinese military to weaken the US & European allies.

    The only way to stop China aggression is to be tough on them not pander to them. The world needs to understand that they are intent on world domination & control. Obama/Biden administration fostered that agenda thru weakness. Biden’s son even capitalized on that situation financially thru influence peddling.

  2. “… Fennell maintains that China’s delay had nothing to do with trying to harm the rest of the world.

    “It had to do with the internal dynamics of the Chinese Communist Party and their reaction to SARS 17 years ago,” Fennell said.”

    Much the same can be said about President Trump’s incendiary (to some) statements, he is not trying to harm anyone; he is appealing to his base.

    “nothing to do with trying to harm the rest of the world” but delay insured that harm to the world was going to happen. China should have expected aggressive words from a country with power and influence.

    “Madeira believes this year’s speech was a “missed opportunity” for Trump to show a sense of global leadership.” Indeed, almost every situation is a missed opportunity for leadership with President Trump; he is egotistical and intelligent and has power which allow him to have accomplishments. He may be a leader of sorts but he seems incapable of leading those who are not enamored of him. He thinks everyone should follow his “leadership” and dismisses those who don’t.

  3. Joe Biden knew. That’s the chief theme in the new Senate report on Hunter Biden’s laundry list of bad, possibly criminal behavior. The report notes that Hunter Biden was wired $3.5M from a Russian woman under mysterious circumstances.

    Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has “not spoken accurately about his knowledge of his son’s involvement in Burisma” or the problem it caused for the Obama administration.

    “While this Report is focused on Hunter Biden and James Biden and other family members of Joe Biden, not Joe Biden himself, it is also true that Joe Biden was revealed to have not spoken accurately about his knowledge of his son’s involvement in Burisma, the Ukrainian energy concern”

    Biden said he didn’t know about it when the report shows that in fact, some bureaucrats were so concerned about Hunter Biden’s role that they had briefed him, that they had alerted the FBI.

    Joe Biden has previously lied about his knowledge of his son’s dealings, but Obama era officials testified to the Senate committee investigating that they had personally briefed Biden on the matter and how big of a conflict of interest it was. They also, in at least one case, alerted the FBI about what was going on.

Leave A Reply

More in News, Top Stories
Lehigh Valley animal shelters see unusual patterns in intake and adoptions

Bucks County SPCA, Lehigh County Humane Society and Logan’s Heroes — all animal shelters in and around the Lehigh Valley...

Close